Remerciez-le!

Remerciez @Admin pour avoir partagé cet document gratuitement, de la manière la plus simple, en partageant sur les réseaux sociaux.

2/2021 Bachelard Studies Études Bachelardiennes Studi Bachelardiani MIMESIS Edi

2/2021 Bachelard Studies Études Bachelardiennes Studi Bachelardiani MIMESIS Editors/Directeurs/Direttori Renato BOCCALI (Università IULM, Milano), Jean-Jacques WUNENBURGER (Univer- sité Jean Moulin, Lyon III) Editor in Chief/ Rédacteur en Chef/Capo redattore Aurosa ALISON (Politecnico di Milano) Deputy Editors in Chief / Rédacteur en Chef adjoints/Vice-Capo redattori Riccardo BARONTINI (Ghent University), Jacques POIRIER (Université de Bourgogne), Eileen RIZO PATRON (Binghamton University) Comité de Rédaction/ Editorial Board/Comitato redazionale Claudio D’AURIZIO (Università della Calabria), Annagiulia CANESSO (Università di Padova), Paulina GURGUL (Jagiellonian University), Gilles HIERONIMUS (Univer- sité Jean Moulin, Lyon III), Gerardo IENNA (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia), Ana Tais PORTANOVA (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre), Catarina SANT’ANNA (Universidade Federal da Bahia) Comité Scientifique/ Scientific Board/Comitato scientifico Charles ALUNNI (École normale supérieure de Paris), Lutz BAUMANN (Johannes Gu- tenberg-Universität Mainz), Maria Francesca BONICALZI (Università degli Studi di Ber- gamo), Vincent BONTEMS (École normale supérieure, CEA, Paris), Ionel BUSE (Uni- versitatea din Craiova), Rodolphe CALIN (Université Paul Valery, Montpellier III), Mario CASTELLANA (Università del Salento, Lecce), Valeria CHIORE (Università L’Orientale di Napoli), Frédéric FRUTEAU DE LACLOS (Université Paris 1 – Panthéon Sorbonne), Nicole FABRE (GIREP, Paris), Anne FAGOT-LARGEAULT (Collège de France, Paris), Elio FRANZINI (Università degli Studi di Milano), GAO YANPING (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing), Etienne KLEIN (CEA, Paris), Marie-Noël LAPOUJADE (Universi- dad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México), Thierry PAQUOT (Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne), Fabrizio PALOMBI (Università della Calabria, Arcava- cata di Rende), Daniel PARROCCHIA (Université Jean Moulin Lyon III), Jean-Philippe PIERRON (Université de Bourgogne, Dijon), Marta PLES-BEBEN (Uniwerytet Śląski w Katowicach), Gaspare POLIZZI (Università di Pisa), Delia POPA (Villanova University), Hans-Jörg RHEINBERGER (Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte, Berlin), Roberto REVELLO (Università dell’Insubria), Christian THIBOUTOT (Université du Québec à Montréal), Carlo VINTI (Università degli Studi di Perugia) Redazione bachelardstudies@mimesisjournals.com This issue was made possible by the support Ce numéro a été réalisé avec le support de Questo numero è stato realizzato con il contributo Università IULM, Milano Association Internationale Gaston Bachelard Mimesis Edizioni (Milano – Udine) www.mimesisedizioni.it mimesis@mimesisedizioni.it Issn: 2724-5470 Isbn: 9788857587660 © 2021 – Mim Edizioni SRL Via Monfalcone, 17/19 – 20099 Sesto San Giovanni (MI) Phone: +39 02 24861657 / 24416383 REGISTRO DI STAMPA – TRIBUNALE DI NAPOLIR.G. n. 5571/19 Proprietario: Associazione Italiana Gaston Bachelard Legale rappresentante: Aurorarosa Alison Direttore responsabile: Aurorarosa Alison Autorizzazione n. 34 – del 24/07/2019 Bachelard Studies Études Bachelardiennes Studi Bachelardiani Indice Indice EDITORIAL – ÉDITORIAL – EDITORIALE 5 Ilona Błocian, Marta Ples-Bęben, Gaston Bachelard, the “non-psychoanalyst” 11 Ilona Błocian, Marta Ples-Bęben, Gaston Bachelard, le « non-psychanalyste » 17 Ilona Błocian, Marta Ples-Bęben, Gaston Bachelard, il “non-psicanalista” THE LETTER – LA LETTRE – LA LETTERA 25 Marcela Renée Becerra Batán, Gaston Bachelard et la psychanalyse. Rencontres, transformations et usages. 43 Kamila Morawska, Gaston Bachelard’s problems with psychoanalysis. Between Freud and Jung. 55 Zoé Pfister, Gaston Bachelard et le rêve de la nuit : quelle méthode pour un « mystère d’ontologie » ?. 75 Anton Vydra, Openness, Pedagogy, and Parenthood in Gaston Bachelard. MIND – L’ESPRIT – LO SPIRITO 91 Joël Clerget, Lumière du logos sur une conscience obscure. 103 Nevio Del Longo, Gaston Bachelard e il “ritardo della psicoanalisi”. 113 Nicole Fabre, Bachelard et la psychanalyse : un compagnonnage houleux. 125 Christian Thiboutot, L’enfance dans La poétique de la rêverie. Lire Bachelard avec Pontalis et la psychanalyse. FOR FURTHER READING – POUR ALLER PLUS LOIN – PER ULTERIORI LETTURE 139 Bachelard and Psychoanalysis Bachelard et la Psychanalyses Bachelard e la Psicoanalisi 141 Bachelard and Psychoanalysis in Poland Bachelard et la Psychanalyse en Pologne Bachelard e la Psicoanalisi in Polonia ARCHIVES – ARCHIVES – ARCHIVI 145 Robert Desoille, A propos de l’utilisation du « Rêve éveillé dirigé » dans un traitement dit psychanalytique. 151 Juliette Favez-Boutonnier, Extrait d’une leçon donnée par Madame Favez-Boutonnier à la Sorbonne en 1966 consacrée à l’imagination. 165 Jacques Poirier, Gaston Bachelard entre Freud et Jung in Les Lettres françaises et la psychanalyse (1900-1945). 173 Hans-Jörg Rheinberger, A Remark on Gaston Bachelard’s Idea of a Psychoanalysis of Knowledge. 185 Jean-Jacques Wunenburger, La psychanalyse sexuée du feu, entre Freud et Jung. RESONANCES – RÉSONANCES – RISONANZE 197 Ilona Błocian, Paweł Dybel, Marta Ples-Bęben, Cogito et le monde des images entretien avec Paweł Dybel. CRITICAL NOTES – NOTES CRITIQUES – NOTE CRITICHE 209 Marta Ples Beben, Eric Thouvenel : Gaston Bachelard et le problème- cinéma. Questions d’images posées à un philosophe iconoclaste, Paris, Éditions Mimesis, 2020 213 Paulina Gurgul, Małgorzata Karwowska: Świadomość rodząca obrazy. Studia z antropologii literatury. Łódź, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2020 217 Jean-Jacques Wunenburger, Edmundo Morin de Carvalho : Poésie et science chez Bachelard. Liens et ruptures épistémologiques, Paris, L’Harmattan, 2010 221 Carlo Vinti, Fabio Minazzi, Epistemologia storico-evolutiva e neo- realismo logico, Leo S. Olschki Editore, 2021 227 ABSTRACT Bachelard Studies / Études Bachelardiennes / Studi Bachelardiani, n. 2, 2021 • Mimesis Edizioni, Milano-Udine Web: mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/bachelardstudies • ISSN (online): 2724-5470 • ISBN: 9788857581644 • DOI: 10.7413/2724-5470001 © 2021 – MIM EDIZIONI SRL. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-4.0). Editorial Gaston Bachelard, the “non-psychoanalyst” The relationship between Gaston Bachelard’s philosophy and psychoanalysis can be described as changeable, even turbulent. The common points and ruptures, the departures and returns, the criticisms and reformulations of the source-con- cepts linked to the ambiguous attitude that Bachelard had towards psychoanaly- sis overlapped the changes already inscribed in his philosophy. We must add the importance of the diversification of theoretical and methodological proposals that arose in the psychoanalytical movement in the broad sense. We can consider this relation of Gaston Bachelard’s thought to psychoanalysis first of all from the perspective of the history of philosophy, as an example of in- fluence and inventive reinterpretation. One can also study the approaches of the concepts by paying attention to their vitality and the meanings inscribed in them and generated by them. Finally, one can focus on philosophy itself as a research project that develops in a particular context of history and problems. Bachelard adapted the key notions and methods of Sigmund Freud’s psychoa- nalysis and Carl Gustav Jung’s analytical psychology to his own research needs, both in the analyses of the development of scientific knowledge and in the re- flection on the poetic imagination. Let us underline the originality of Bachelard’s psychoanalytical projects. From a research point of view, the philosopher uses psy- choanalysis to: 1) examine reveries, their images and ideas, as well as the work of the creative imagination and the consciousness of the dreaming subject; 2) to pu- rify the mind of unconscious epistemological obstacles that result from the activity of the subjective and dreaming imagination, the source of images. According to Bachelard, these obstacles are always an unauthorized departure from the abstrac- tion of scientific thought. Independently of this originality, or perhaps because of it, this philosophy can- not be qualified as “psychoanalytic” because it goes beyond the limits of psychoa- nalysis, both in its theoretical and practical layers. In the following pages we want to show this particular attitude, both free and deeply philosophical, which links Bachelard to psychoanalysis. We will try to sketch its main characteristics on the example of one of the concepts taken up by Bachelard from psychoanalysis and reformulated by himself in the course of the discussion with its original formula and with the wider theoretical context in which the concept is examined. Bachelard Studies / Études Bachelardiennes / Studi Bachelardiani, n. 2, 2021 • Mimesis Edizioni, Milano-Udine Web: mimesisjournals.com/ojs/index.php/bachelardstudies • ISSN (online): 2724-5470 • ISBN: 9788857587660 • DOI: 10.7413/2724-5470024 © 2021 – MIM EDIZIONI SRL. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY-4.0). Editorial 6 There are many concepts of this type, specific to psychoanalysis and reformu- lated by Bachelard; the complex, sublimation, the unconscious, or the superego are some examples. Each of them is strongly rooted in his original theory. Never- theless, in each case, Bachelard gave them a new meaning closely linked to his own philosophy. In this context, Leszek Brogowski calls Bachelard’s thinking “con- ceptual nomadism”1. Bachelard uses categories from various contexts, not only psychoanalytical ones. He gives them new meanings derived from his own pro- jects. In the theoretical horizon of psychoanalysis itself, the ways of understand- ing these categories are quite unexpected and “unconventional”. However, in the case of Jung’s doctrine, certain meanings of the terms “archetype”, “unconscious” or “complex” seem to indicate close, broadening and, in some cases, particularly precise perspectives. These meanings are often interpreted from the perspective of other forms of human activity, or literary images – individualized, “skillful,” and “genuine”, as Bachelard would say. Depending on the fields of reference, the term “archetype” here shows its potential to activate innumerable, beautiful, and crea- tive forms of realization that reveal the astonishing variety and undeniable richness of imagination. In the following pages we want to draw the reader’s attention to this broad and deep category of the “archetype” which Bachelard derived from the analytical psy- chology of Carl Gustav Jung. Although this category was not created by Jung, his theory of the collective uploads/Litterature/ bachelard-studies-etudes-bachelardienne.pdf