Remerciez-le!

Remerciez @Admin pour avoir partagé cet document gratuitement, de la manière la plus simple, en partageant sur les réseaux sociaux.

The ibero caucasian It is a curious fact that ??whereas the Ibero-Caucasian and Euskaro- Kartvelian hypotheses have a number of adherents among Kartvelists the Nostratic one has nTohtemRiestewanitdhFaapllparonvdaRl eavmivoanl gofththeemIbaetraol-lC ? a uK

It is a curious fact that ??whereas the Ibero-Caucasian and Euskaro- Kartvelian hypotheses have a number of adherents among Kartvelists the Nostratic one has nTohtemRiestewanitdhFaapllparonvdaRl eavmivoanl gofththeemIbaetraol-lC ? a uKclaimsiaonv H y p o t h e s is even though the gbryoKuenvdiwn oTrukitfeo rPNroofestsrsaotricowf Aans tdhornopeoinlogthyeatUtShSeRU nainvderKsiatértdveliManondtartéaapl lay a key rsHopilesetcoiianriloisegtsrstaaopbuhlitisashidLinienggGutehisoetricgsaoiauV noadln d c oa r lrm e sop s ot nn do e no cnpeeps in E vG ??e en oragt ipa rehsaevnet gfoenwe Kartvelian on record as supporting any form of the Nostratic hypothesis ikobava and his school were oTfhceouIrbseerhoo-sCtialeutcoasthiaenvehryypidoetahoefsNisoastnrdatitch esinhciestiot sgprlaitpKhayrtovfelAiabnkgheanzetiaically fpropm t-h e two North Caucasian families Gamq ? relidze Ma ? ? avariani as was mentioned earlier steered clear of any explicit endorsement of either Nos- tratic in general or a genetic relation between Indo-European and Kartvelian in particular even as they leveled strong criticism at the empirical grounding of the Ibero-Caucasian hypothesis e g Gamq ? relidze Klimov himself walked a thin line between the Ibero-Caucasian and Nostratic camps criticizing the ?rst without rejecting it out of hand while on the other hand acknowledging evidence for Indo-European-Kartvelian isoglosses without however recognizing a genetic link between the two families As a result Klimov came under attack from both sides ikobava accused him of being a Nostratic sympathizer whereas toward the end of his life Klimov was upbraided for being unfairly critical of Nos- tratic Manaster-Ramer The Ibero-Caucasian hypothesis and the historiography of Abkhazia The preceding account of the Ibero-Caucasian hypothesis is only part of the story If on the one hand Marr and ikobava were opposed by proponents of a uniformitarian method ologically-rigorous and language-centered historical approach on the other their work came under attack from historians seeking to reinterpret or even redraw the complex scenarios of contact mixing and layering that both Marr and ikobava regarded as characteristic of Caucasian ethnohistory Among the presuppositions underlying criticism from this second camp are post-war Soviet ethnogenesis theory which favored a simplistic superposition of territory language ethnos and nation and the distinctive variety of ? hermeneutics of suspicion ? which ourished in the Soviet intellectual ecosystem and continues to thrive ?fteen years after the break-up of the USSR This section begins with a detour into medieval Georgian literary and historical studies during which the Ibero-Caucasian hypothesis will fade from view temporarily to return later on intertwined with the thread of Soviet and post-Soviet historiographic templates ? Klimov attributed the existence of apparently cognate lexemes in Indo- European and Kartvelian to intensive contacts between the two speech communities at various periods Klimov ? John Benjamins Publishing Company All rights reserved C Kevin Tuite P ? avle Ingoroq ? va Giorgi Mer ?ule and the ? Life of Grigol of Xandzta ? Less than a month after ikobava ? s triumphant speech at the special ses- sion of the Academy of Sciences on Stalin ? s contribution to linguistics a thick manuscript by the literary historian P ? avle Ingoroq ? va ?? was delivered to the printers