Remerciez-le!

Remerciez @Admin pour avoir partagé cet document gratuitement, de la manière la plus simple, en partageant sur les réseaux sociaux.

Jurisprudence marking guide

OFFICIAL Dr B Kabumba Ms J Ngaiza MAKERERE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW UNIVERSITY EXAMINATIONS ACADEMIC YEAR FOURTH YEAR SEMESTERS I II EXAMINATIONS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF LAWS JURISPRUDENCE Undergraduate Programme FIRST YEAR SEMESTERS I II EXAMINATIONS FOR DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS Postgraduate Programme Overall Marking Guide for coursework and examination - Awarded for Excellent answers to the questions good understanding identi ?cation and appreciation of the main theories concepts ideas behind the questions and capacity to apply them to answer the questions and in making comprehensive assessment of issues involved This includes a good use of relevant authorities coupled with originality and independent thinking clear arguments and presentation of persuasive divergent views - Awarded for Good answers to the questions with good appreciation of main issues and ability to make appropriate critical points which show good understanding of issues behind the questions Exhibiting awareness and appreciation of the main theories concepts ideas and is able to apply them in a coherent and well-presented and argued manner Presence of originality and possibly critical independent thinking - Awarded for Competent answers to the questions bringing out useful points and applying relevant ideas There is limited analysis and originality even if substantiating and presenting arguments and comments relevantly and intelligently - Awarded for Sensible relevant responses and comments and maybe some level of reasonable good arguments though also characterized by limited use and understanding of the questions and applicable theories or application of authorities - Awarded for Inadequate presentation characterized by little evidence of reading and understanding of the questions or relevant concepts applicable in answering the questions The answers contain unrelated or inappropriate inapplicable arguments The essays are mainly unoriginal incomprehensible or merely descriptive and unsubstantiated characterised by some level of incoherence in argument C