Remerciez-le!

Remerciez @Admin pour avoir partagé cet document gratuitement, de la manière la plus simple, en partageant sur les réseaux sociaux.

Department of Education Cordillera Administrative Region DIVISION OF BAGUIO CIT

Department of Education Cordillera Administrative Region DIVISION OF BAGUIO CITY STO. TOMAS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Sto. Tomas Central, Baguio City October 24, 2016 VIRGINIA C. ALINDAYO School Head Sto. Tomas National High School Sto. Tomas Central, Baguio City Ma’am, Respectfully submitting my Training Proposal as a RESOURCE SPEAKER on the topic ‘Failure Rate – Status Report and Mid-Year Adjustment’ as stated in the STNHS training matrix for the Mid-Year In-Service Training (INSET) activities from October 24-28, 2016 in support to the STNHS stakeholders to make corrective adjustments in the implementation of the school program/s such as reducing failure rate in the achievement of improved learner outcomes. Thank you very much. Very Truly Yours, ARACELI K. TAMIRAY FRRP - Chairman Department of Education Cordillera Administrative Region DIVISION OF BAGUIO CITY STO. TOMAS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Sto. Tomas Central, Baguio City Mid-Year In-Service Training S.Y. 2016-2017 SESSION GUIDE I. Session Title: Failure Rate – Status Report and Mid-Year Adjustment II. Duration: 2 hours III. Venue: Sto. Tomas National High School Conference Hall IV. Target Participants: 23 Faculty and Staff Members 3 PTA Officers (Day 1 & 2) 3 Barangay Officials (Day 1 & 2) 9 SSG Officers/Representatives (Day 1 & 2) 9 Club/Organization Officers (Day 1 & 2) V. Link to the previous session/topic: Every end of the school year, each school assess learning outcomes to check school performance if the school is performing or not. One indicator of school performance is to have zero failure rates. For S.Y 2015-2016 STNHS the failure rate is = 5.6% which is relatively alarming, it is with this reason why this session topic will be undertaken to re-visit the status of the implemented process flow for FRRP if functional or not for necessary adjustment . VI. Link to the next session/topic: It is the intention of this session topic ‘Failure Rate – Status Report and Mid- Year Adjustment’ for the teachers, administrators and other school stake holders to continuously do their part and responsibility in helping students who are at risk of failing in their academic subjects with the aim to reduce school failure rate. VII. Learning Objectives: At the end of the session, participants should be able to: 1. To list the number of students who failed in the different subjects per year level for the first quarter as determined from subject teachers data of the current class record and grading sheets; 2. To assess the academic subject/s where students are having difficulty for the subjects teachers to do necessary adjustment and actions to reduce the number of students failed in their subject; 3. To investigate the reasons why students failed for the teachers, administrators and parents to design vital actions and interventions in reducing failure rate from the previous school year; 4. To re-visit the process flow in addressing failure rate and plan specific actions to be undertaken to lessen students failures for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters. VIII. Key Understandings: Facilitating early student engagement and success is not an immediate interest or movement. It is likely to be a continuing attribute and responsibility in all education contexts. The school challenges arising from increased student diversity, wider access and varied entry pathways requires school to consider a broader range of strategies beyond those would normally associate with classroom teaching and the role and responsibilities of a teacher. It is also increasingly recognized that risk of student occurs across the student lifecycle, but is particularly salient at points of transition, rise of academic challenge or study-life conflict. Supporting student success and reducing academic risk necessitates that teachers should develop new and creative partnerships between academic, administrative and professional staff. Thus, supporting student success in the present context involves shifts in traditional strategies, skills and roles, and is genuinely everyone’s business. Thus, while accepting these responsibilities in this regard, teachers also need to design strategies that are both effective and sustainable and embed these as ongoing core business in each of the school stakeholders. The topic focuses on the school performance indicator such as failure rate as school responsibility in responding to students who may be at risk of academic failure. However, it is recognized that students face a wide range of personal, social and financial risks, which can impact on their studies and their lives. VII. Methodology: A. Pre-implementation Date Activity Person-in-charge Logistics October 17 Faculty meeting – distribution of teachers task for the INSET Virginia C. Alindayo Copy of the INSET proposal Training Schedule, Function Of The School Training Program Management Team Session Guide October 21 Gathering of data for first quarter failures Araceli K. Tamiray All subject teachers Computer Printer Bond paper October 22-23 Preparation of hand-outs and presentation slides Araceli K. Tamiray Computer Printer Bond paper Reproduction Cost B. List of Resource Speaker Name and Qualification of Resource Speaker Topic Session No. Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Review: SRCs and 2016-2017 AIP D1 – S1 Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Re-orientation: SBM and SBM assessment Tool, MOVs D1 – S2 Marissa M. Binmangon – School DORP Chairman Araceli K. Tamiray _ School FRRP chairman Status Report: Performance Indicators a. Monthly Attendance and Dropout Rate b. Failure Rate Per Learning Area D1 – S3 Marissa M. Binmangon – School DORP Chairman Status Report: School DORP D1 – S4 Marissa M. Binmangon – School DORP Chairman Mid-Year Adjustment : School DORP D1 – S5 Araceli K. Tamiray _ School FRRP chairman Status Report and Mid-Year Adjustment: School Failure Reduction Program D2 – S1 Marie Tina T. Gabriel – Program Coordinator Status Report: Program/Organization/Work/Action Plan and Implementation D2 – S2 Joyce M. Balusdan - Program Coordinator Continuation…Status Report: -SSG and Clubs -PTA -Barangay Education Committee D2 – S3 Program Coordinator Organization/club presidents SSG PTA Barangay Education Committee Workshop: Re-alignment of Work/Action Plans -program coordinators -organization presidents -SSG and clubs -PTA -Barangay Education Committee D2 – S4 Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Facilitator Presentation and Critiquing of Outputs - DRRM - Brigada D2 – S5 Program Coordinator Organization/club presidents SSG PTA Barangay Education Committee Continuation… (presentation and critiquing of outputs) - programs D3 – S1 Danny Marquez – HT1 Facilitator Continuation… (presentation and critiquing of outputs) D3 – S2 - organization Lourdes B. Lomas-e - PSDS Positive Discipline D3 – S3 Bing Apacguid – ICT – SHS Teacher Discussion: 21st Century Teachers for the 21st Century Learner D3 – S4 Marilou T. Gomeyac, SEPS Discussion: Non-Traditional Forms and Assessment and Rubric Design D3- S5 All Teachers Marisa G. Dacpano – Aral Pan. JHS Teacher Facilitator Workshop: Designing Non-Traditional Assessment Presentation and Critiquing of Outputs D4 – S1 Rufino Domillo – Aral Pan. SHS Teacher Discussion: The Learning Action Cell D4 – S2 Danny Marquez – HT1 Discussion – The Fine Art of facilitating Peer Teaching, Group Discussion and Practice by Doing D4 – S3 Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Facilitator LAC AND LM Plans D4 – S4 Per Learning Area Workshop: Preparing NAT style assessment of the Cognitive Dimensions by Anderson and Krathwohl D4- S5 Marjorie B. Saingan – English SHS Teacher Facilitator Presentation and Critiquing of Outputs D5 – S1 Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Re-orientation of the OPCRF and alignment of the IPCRF D5 – S2 All Teachers Finalization and Submission of IPCRF D5 – S3 Crisma L. Bautista, Lorielyn Daping and Marie Tina T. Gabriel Facilitators Group Dynamics D5 – S4 C. Training Matrix – See attached copy D. Post-Implementation Date Activity Person-in-charge Logistics Nov. March Adjusted Process Flow/Work Plans for FRRP Virginia C. Alindayo Danny Marquez Araceli K. Tamiray All Subject Teachers PTA Parents Computer Unit Printer Bond paper Nov. March Teachers’ prepared list of requirements for performance task All Subject Teachers Computer Unit Printer Bond paper List of PT requirements Nov. March Subject teachers give the list of requirements for performance task to the adviser All Subject Teachers Class Adviser Computer Unit Printer Bond paper List of PT Requirements Nov. March Grade level coordinator summarizes the requirements for performance task in all learning area Class Adviser Grade Level Coordinator Computer Unit Printer Bond paper List of PT requirements Nov. March Orientation of Parents and students on failure reduction program Virginia C. Alindayo Danny Marquez Araceli K. Tamiray Computer Unit Printer Bond paper Sound System Nov. March Adviser distribute the list of PT requirements to the students w/ their parents Class Adviser Computer Unit Printer Bond paper Written Requirements Reproduction Cost Nov. March Students are given two (2) meetings to do the Performance Task in the classroom All Subject Teachers Computer Unit Printer Bond paper Nov. March Quarterly Monitoring of PT requirements list FRRP – Chairman and members Computer Unit Printer Bond paper Nov. March Gathering of data and documents for Failure Rate Reduction Program FRRP – Chairman and members Computer Unit Printer Bond paper Accomplishment Report Prepared by: Recommending Approval: ARACELI K. TAMIRAY DANNY MARQUEZ FRRP-Chairman HT1 Approved: VIRGINIA C. ALINDAYO School Head Department of Education Cordillera Administrative Region DIVISION OF BAGUIO CITY STO. TOMAS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Sto. Tomas Central, Baguio City Mid-Year uploads/Management/ sto-tomas-national-high-school.pdf