Remerciez-le!

Remerciez @Admin pour avoir partagé cet document gratuitement, de la manière la plus simple, en partageant sur les réseaux sociaux.

Hay guide Comparison of Hay guide chart pro ?le system of job evaluation and the GLPC job evaluation scheme with the principles of the local government NJC job evaluation scheme The independent Local Government Pay Commission stated that the principles of

Comparison of Hay guide chart pro ?le system of job evaluation and the GLPC job evaluation scheme with the principles of the local government NJC job evaluation scheme The independent Local Government Pay Commission stated that the principles of single status were good and job evaluation should continue The Commission added that the NJC Job Evaluation Scheme provided a ? good basis for going forward ? and the presumption should be that it would be used for single status grading reviews If any employer wishes to use an alternative the onus is on the employer to justify the use of the other scheme i e they must demonstrate that the alternative scheme meets the principles of the NJC scheme Attached is UNISON ? s assessment on how the Hay and GLPC Job Evaluation Schemes match up to the principles of the NJC JE Scheme The principles are set out in the NJC Joint Evaluation Technical Working Group Technical Note attached UNISON recommends the NJC Job Evaluation Scheme as the only one if implemented properly that will fully protect local government employers against equal pay cases The choice of job evaluation scheme is very important because di ?erent schemes may produce di ?erent outcomes The Hay Job Evaluation Scheme may compress salaries at the bottom and stretch those at the top The GLPC Job Evaluation Scheme can be expected to deliver similar outcomes to the NJC Job Evaluation Scheme but may undervalue frontline jobs which have a responsibility for people and put emotional demands on the jobholder If an employer proposes alternative scheme s branches will want to address ? Is the scheme analytical i e factor based ? Are the factors suitable for all the jobs to be covered Do they cover all signi ?cant features ? Do the factor levels represent genuine steps in demand amongst the jobs to be covered ? Does the weighting system match the values of the organisation Are the most heavily weighted factors the most important ones to the organisation ? Does the scheme comply with equal value principles and practices mpl f data localgov job evaluation other schemes branch brie ?ng on hay glpc ga jj CBackground JETWG and NJC JE Scheme The Job Evaluation Joint Technical Working Group JETWG was set up by the national employers and unions during the Single Status negotiations as a sub committee of the NJC It designed and developed the NJC JE Scheme and promotes its use It comprises representatives from the employers and unions and each side had its own technical adviser JETWG issues comprehensive technical advice and supports the NJC on JE matters and the use of the NJC JES In designing and developing the NJC Job Evaluation Scheme the JETWG drew on and applied the Green Book principles of equality transparency openness and joint working The NJC Job Evaluation Scheme has factors - Knowledge - Mental skills - Interpersonal and communication skills - Physical skills - Initiative and independence - Physical demands - Mental